Every business that sells its people's time has a version of the same problem: the hours, the staffing and the invoice live in different places. What differs is which part hurts most.
"Stop leaving money on the table to scope creep — see every hour, every margin leak, in real time rather than at month-end."
Retainers quietly absorb work nobody scoped and nobody bills. The leak isn't dramatic, which is exactly why it survives: a few unbilled hours per client per week, invisible until the year's margin comes in lower than the model said it would. Timewize makes the overrun visible while the retainer is still running.
"See every engineer's capacity, utilization and billable time in real time — not at the quarterly review."
People are split across three client projects at once, and the cost of that fragmentation never appears on a timesheet. Utilization looks fine in aggregate while individuals are quietly at 140% and others sit on the bench. Timewize computes utilization per person from approved hours, so over-allocation surfaces before it becomes attrition.
"An audit trail that holds up, and revenue recognition that isn't a spreadsheet."
Compliance deadlines drive the timetable here, and they differ by region — PCAOB quality-management obligations in the US, CSRD transposition across the EU. What both require is an authenticated record of who did what work when, which is a byproduct of doing time capture properly rather than a separate project.
"Which partner engagements are profit leaders, and which are drains — across every billing model at once."
T&M, fixed fee, milestone and retainer often run side by side in the same portfolio, which is why the profitability question is so hard to answer quickly. The billing model lives on the contract, so mixed portfolios roll up without anyone maintaining a parallel spreadsheet.
Regional differences aren't cosmetic. What you're replacing, what you can budget, and what you're legally required to produce all change by market — so the product and the price change with them.
The largest concentration of the firms we're built for. Priced in USD, flat fee, unlimited users. Accounting-sector entry is timed to quality-management compliance deadlines.
B2B e-invoicing mandates arrive on different dates by country — Germany from January 2027, France from 2026. Priced in EUR, with a premium reflecting the data-protection and e-invoicing work required to serve EU customers properly.
Syberviz is based in Hyderabad, so this is home ground. Indian agencies typically run an incumbent stack costing ₹12,500–20,000 a month, so pricing is set against that reality rather than converted from a US figure.
On India-specific compliance: GST e-invoicing through the IRP, INR-native billing and UPI collection are requirements we've researched and scoped, not features we've shipped. If you're an Indian firm above the e-invoicing threshold, ask us where that work stands before you commit — we'll give you the real answer.
Whichever of these you are, the mechanism is identical: capture time properly at the point of work, approve it once, and let staffing, delivery status and billing all read from that same record. Nearly every reporting disagreement inside a services firm traces back to two systems holding two versions of the same hour.